The idea that farming-based societies were a mistake could
likely be supported by the fact that when societies used farming tools such as
hoes or plows it had a direct impact on how their society was run gender-wise.
Even now there are still unresolved issues in regards to gender-roles and
specific genders places in society potentially as a result of the use of hoes
vs. plows and by extension because of farming. I thought there were some
connections that could be made between the two readings as the plough and hoe
had such seemingly major effects on gender roles in society today. Also, Farming
could be seen as divisive due to the fact that it separated societies by gender
roles, and class divisions.
The Worst Mistake in Human History slightly altered
my perception of how beneficial farming was and how we perceive
hunter-gatherers today. I was wondering why we perceive hunter-gatherers or
people from non-agrarian societies as primitive, because the belief that there
was no time for art or culture in those societies was shown to be false in
Jared Diamond’s interpretation? Even today there are still hunter-gatherers and
their lifestyle has not been proven to be any less fulfilling than people from
our society. Diamond even said that these “so-called primitive people” were
still able to “have plenty of leisure time, sleep a good deal, and work less
hard than their farming neighbors”. So why do we see them as primitive when
their quality of life seems to be just as satisfying?
No comments:
Post a Comment